Monthly archive · September 2026 · revised 2026-09-08 · r1
Palm City housing data, September 2026
This is dated Palm City housing data, not today's market. It covers price cuts and days on market for listings as of September 7, 2026. The original monthly edition was frozen .
For today's figures use the live pages linked under each section.
Palm City price cuts and days on market, September 2026
Listings as of September 7, 2026. Live page with today's figures: Palm City price cuts and days on market. Every city: South Florida price cuts and days on market.
Headline options
- 49% of Palm City houses for sale are asking less than their original list price
- Seller Blink Rate™ in Palm City: 49% of houses list below original asking, against 48.7% across Martin County
- Buying in Palm City? 50 of the 102 houses for sale are asking below their original price, by a median $33K
Lede
PALM CITY, Fla., September 7, 2026 - 49% of the 102 single-family homes listed for sale in Palm City (50 listings) have a current asking price below their original list price, according to PBP Real Estate's analysis of BeachesMLS listing data as of September 7, 2026. Among those 50 reduced listings, the median reduction is 4% (about $33K). Condominiums: 17 for sale, below the 30-listing floor, so no percentages are reported for them.
Quotable
"49 percent of single-family homes for sale in Palm City have a current asking price below their original list price; among those 50 reduced listings the median reduction is $33K."
"Among active Palm City houses, the median recorded CumulativeDaysOnMarket value is 59 days and the median recorded DaysOnMarket value is 54 days. These are MLS-recorded fields, not an independently reconstructed listing history."
"At the snapshot, 55.9 percent of the 34 Palm City houses under contract had a recorded asking price below their original list price; the median reduction among that group was 8.7 percent. The remainder were not recorded as below their original list price, which is not a price history. Agreed contract prices are not inferred from these asking prices."
Charts and source labels

Seller Blink Rate™: share of active listings whose current asking price is below their original list price, Palm City versus Martin County, houses, September 7, 2026. Not a price history. Source: BeachesMLS via PBP Real Estate. Download PNG

Active Palm City houses by MLS-recorded CumulativeDaysOnMarket value, September 7, 2026. Shares use listings with a recorded value in that field; 40.2% of houses exceed 90 days. The field is not a reconstructed listing history. Source: BeachesMLS via PBP Real Estate. Download PNG

Share of active Palm City houses asking below their original list price, by current asking-price band, September 7, 2026. Bands with 10 to 29 listings marked small; under 10 show a count only. Source: BeachesMLS via PBP Real Estate. Download PNG
Downloads and methodology
Reissued journalist package r1, revised 2026-09-08: PDF · Plain text · ZIP with charts. Method: Seller Blink Rate™ and recorded days on market.
Methodology as printed in this September 2026 reissue r1
Method, in plain English
Method, in plain English.
Source snapshot
What we counted: active and under-contract residential listings whose MLS City field is Palm City, permitted for internet display in PBP Real Estate's BeachesMLS data feed, in one snapshot pulled 2026-09-07 12:06:07 UTC (data as of September 7, 2026). The kit reports counts, medians, shares and comparisons calculated from recorded MLS fields; it does not estimate any property's value.
Current and original asking prices
Asking below original: a listing's current ListPrice is lower than its OriginalListPrice in that snapshot. This is a comparison of two recorded prices at this snapshot, not a price history; listings not below original may be unchanged, raised or missing a price (51 unchanged, 1 above original, 0 without both prices among houses). The median reduction is the middle value among reduced listings only, in percent and in dollars separately; it is reported when at least 10 listings are reduced.
Recorded days on market
Days on market: DaysOnMarket and CumulativeDaysOnMarket are reported as recorded in the MLS snapshot, each median over the listings with a value in that field; the over-90-day share and the distribution chart use listings with a recorded CumulativeDaysOnMarket value. These fields are not an independently reconstructed property history, do not verify whether or how often a property was relisted, and do not establish how any portal displays days on market.
Current asking-price bands
Price bands use the CURRENT asking price; shares within a band are percentages of that band's listings; bands with 10 to 29 listings are marked small and bands under 10 show a count only; a tie is declared at the reported precision.
Property classification
Segments follow the recorded tax legal description and the shared MLS classification rule: a listing whose legal description records a condominium is a condominium whatever its MLS subtype (townhouse, villa or single-family forms included); Condominium or Stock Cooperative subtypes stay in the condominium segment when the legal description is silent or records a parent parcel, including new-build units; Townhouse and Villa listings not classified as condominiums are reported in the HOA Fee Index and are outside both segments here; houses are the remaining SingleFamilyResidence listings. House and condominium statistics are never combined. These are analytical classifications of recorded fields, not a determination of any property's legal regime.
Under-contract sample
Under contract means Pending or Active Under Contract; under-contract percentages need at least 30 such listings, otherwise counts only.
Publication floor
Publication floor: 30 active listings in a segment; 30 to 39 is marked small. Condominiums are below the floor and appear as a count only. Sample sizes: 102 houses, 17 condominiums, 34 houses under contract.
Geographic scope
Geography is the MLS City field, not a municipal boundary; 13 of 158 Palm City listings carry a different county in the MLS record. County comparisons use listings whose MLS record is in Martin County.
Seller Blink Rate definition
Seller Blink Rate™ is PBP Real Estate's name for the share of active listings asking below their original list price; it describes recorded asking prices, not seller intent or market health.
Peer comparisons
Conditions read: How the read works: the peer baseline is the median of published city shares in the same current median-asking-price tier, houses and condominiums separately. The lower-share label requires a below-original share at least 3 points under baseline and at least 65% of under-contract listings (minimum 10) not recorded as below original. That complement may include unchanged, raised or missing-price records; it is not a history measure. The higher-share label requires 3 or more points above baseline; other results are between the rule's thresholds. With fewer than four peer cities, the county is the baseline and can include the city. Samples of 30–39 active listings require caution. Snapshot comparison only, not speed, causality or a forecast.
Request the aggregate source table
Journalists may request the aggregate source table behind this kit (counts and medians by segment and band; no listing-level MLS records) from info@pbpre.com or 561-395-8418; nothing is gated.
Edition and revised source
Edition: Data as of September 7, 2026 (BeachesMLS pull 2026-09-07T12:06:07+00:00). Corrected edition r1, issued September 8, 2026 (2026-09-08): figures recomputed from a retained later same-day BeachesMLS pull, not an exact reconstruction of the original snapshot, so they may differ from the superseded files; original edition frozen 2026-09-07T19:58:33+00:00.
How to cite the source
Cite the monthly frozen page https://www.pbprealestate.com/press/palm-city/2026-09/ (corrected edition r1). A current-data page may be available at https://www.pbprealestate.com/price-cuts-palm-city/; where published, it uses a separately dated sample and its figures may differ.
Attribution and source limitations
Attribution: PBP Real Estate analysis of BeachesMLS listing data. This data is not verified for authenticity or accuracy and may not reflect all real estate activity in the market. Based on information (c) 2026 BeachesMLS, Inc. Equal Housing Opportunity.
Correction record
Before-and-after correction ledger: Price cuts and days on market
“Before” records the superseded edition, not a current claim. Figure changes include the city sample and its published comparison baselines. Wording changes are listed separately; unchanged fields are retained in the complete ledger.
Figures: city.county_basis through city.segments.houses.bands[1].cut_pct_denominator
| Field | Before — superseded | After — r1 |
|---|---|---|
| city.county_basis | Not reported in this edition | published_city_config_presentation_only |
| city.county_benchmark | Not reported in this edition | Martin |
| city.county_counts.Martin | Not reported in this edition | 145 |
| city.county_counts.St Lucie | Not reported in this edition | 13 |
| city.county_missing_count | Not reported in this edition | 0 |
| city.county_scope | Not reported in this edition | MLS City rows; not a verified municipal polygon |
| city.multi_county | Not reported in this edition | true |
| city.segments.condos.bands[0].cdom_n | Not reported in this edition | 10 |
| city.segments.condos.bands[0].cut_pct_denominator | Not reported in this edition | 10 |
| city.segments.condos.bands[0].valid_price_count | Not reported in this edition | 10 |
| city.segments.condos.bands[1].cdom_n | Not reported in this edition | 7 |
| city.segments.condos.bands[1].cut_pct_denominator | Not reported in this edition | 7 |
| city.segments.condos.bands[1].valid_price_count | Not reported in this edition | 7 |
| city.segments.condos.bands[2].cdom_n | Not reported in this edition | 0 |
| city.segments.condos.bands[2].cut_pct_denominator | Not reported in this edition | 0 |
| city.segments.condos.bands[2].valid_price_count | Not reported in this edition | 0 |
| city.segments.condos.bands[3].cdom_n | Not reported in this edition | 0 |
| city.segments.condos.bands[3].cut_pct_denominator | Not reported in this edition | 0 |
| city.segments.condos.bands[3].valid_price_count | Not reported in this edition | 0 |
| city.segments.condos.cdom_n | Not reported in this edition | 17 |
| city.segments.condos.county_counts.Martin | Not reported in this edition | 10 |
| city.segments.condos.county_counts.St Lucie | Not reported in this edition | 7 |
| city.segments.condos.cut_sample_ok | Not reported in this edition | false |
| city.segments.condos.cut_small_sample | Not reported in this edition | true |
| city.segments.condos.denominators.cut_last30_pct | Not reported in this edition | 17 |
| city.segments.condos.denominators.cut_pct | Not reported in this edition | 17 |
| city.segments.condos.denominators.dom_bucket_pct | Not reported in this edition | 17 |
| city.segments.condos.denominators.fresh_held_pct | Not reported in this edition | 17 |
| city.segments.condos.denominators.median_cdom | Not reported in this edition | 17 |
| city.segments.condos.denominators.median_cut_dollars | Not reported in this edition | 8 |
| city.segments.condos.denominators.median_cut_pct | Not reported in this edition | 8 |
| city.segments.condos.denominators.median_dom | Not reported in this edition | 17 |
| city.segments.condos.denominators.over90_pct | Not reported in this edition | 17 |
| city.segments.condos.denominators.pending_cut_pct | Not reported in this edition | 5 |
| city.segments.condos.denominators.pending_median_cdom | Not reported in this edition | 5 |
| city.segments.condos.denominators.pending_median_cut_pct | Not reported in this edition | 3 |
| city.segments.condos.denominators.relisted_pct | Not reported in this edition | 17 |
| city.segments.condos.denominators.stale_uncut_pct | Not reported in this edition | 17 |
| city.segments.condos.dom_n | Not reported in this edition | 17 |
| city.segments.condos.fresh_held_missing_cdom_count | Not reported in this edition | 0 |
| city.segments.condos.missing_cdom_count | Not reported in this edition | 0 |
| city.segments.condos.missing_dom_count | Not reported in this edition | 0 |
| city.segments.condos.missing_price_count | Not reported in this edition | 0 |
| city.segments.condos.not_below_original_count | Not reported in this edition | 9 |
| city.segments.condos.paired_dom_cdom_n | Not reported in this edition | 17 |
| city.segments.condos.pending_cdom_n | Not reported in this edition | 5 |
| city.segments.condos.pending_cut_sample_ok | Not reported in this edition | false |
| city.segments.condos.pending_dom_n | Not reported in this edition | 5 |
| city.segments.condos.pending_missing_cdom_count | Not reported in this edition | 0 |
| city.segments.condos.pending_missing_dom_count | Not reported in this edition | 0 |
| city.segments.condos.pending_missing_price_count | Not reported in this edition | 0 |
| city.segments.condos.pending_not_below_original_count | Not reported in this edition | 2 |
| city.segments.condos.pending_raised_count | Not reported in this edition | 0 |
| city.segments.condos.pending_sample_ok | Not reported in this edition | false |
| city.segments.condos.pending_unchanged_count | Not reported in this edition | 2 |
| city.segments.condos.pending_valid_price_count | Not reported in this edition | 5 |
| city.segments.condos.unchanged_count | Not reported in this edition | 9 |
| city.segments.condos.valid_price_count | Not reported in this edition | 17 |
| city.segments.houses.bands[0].cdom_n | Not reported in this edition | 11 |
| city.segments.houses.bands[0].cut_pct_denominator | Not reported in this edition | 11 |
| city.segments.houses.bands[0].valid_price_count | Not reported in this edition | 11 |
| city.segments.houses.bands[1].cdom_n | Not reported in this edition | 62 |
| city.segments.houses.bands[1].cut_pct_denominator | Not reported in this edition | 62 |
Figures: city.segments.houses.bands[1].valid_price_count through county_baseline.segments.condos.denominators.over90_pct
| Field | Before — superseded | After — r1 |
|---|---|---|
| city.segments.houses.bands[1].valid_price_count | Not reported in this edition | 62 |
| city.segments.houses.bands[2].cdom_n | Not reported in this edition | 24 |
| city.segments.houses.bands[2].cut_pct_denominator | Not reported in this edition | 24 |
| city.segments.houses.bands[2].valid_price_count | Not reported in this edition | 24 |
| city.segments.houses.bands[3].cdom_n | Not reported in this edition | 5 |
| city.segments.houses.bands[3].cut_pct_denominator | Not reported in this edition | 5 |
| city.segments.houses.bands[3].valid_price_count | Not reported in this edition | 5 |
| city.segments.houses.bands[4].cdom_n | Not reported in this edition | 0 |
| city.segments.houses.bands[4].cut_pct_denominator | Not reported in this edition | 0 |
| city.segments.houses.bands[4].valid_price_count | Not reported in this edition | 0 |
| city.segments.houses.cdom_n | Not reported in this edition | 102 |
| city.segments.houses.county_counts.Martin | Not reported in this edition | 97 |
| city.segments.houses.county_counts.St Lucie | Not reported in this edition | 5 |
| city.segments.houses.cut_sample_ok | Not reported in this edition | true |
| city.segments.houses.cut_small_sample | Not reported in this edition | false |
| city.segments.houses.denominators.cut_last30_pct | Not reported in this edition | 102 |
| city.segments.houses.denominators.cut_pct | Not reported in this edition | 102 |
| city.segments.houses.denominators.dom_bucket_pct | Not reported in this edition | 102 |
| city.segments.houses.denominators.fresh_held_pct | Not reported in this edition | 102 |
| city.segments.houses.denominators.median_cdom | Not reported in this edition | 102 |
| city.segments.houses.denominators.median_cut_dollars | Not reported in this edition | 50 |
| city.segments.houses.denominators.median_cut_pct | Not reported in this edition | 50 |
| city.segments.houses.denominators.median_dom | Not reported in this edition | 102 |
| city.segments.houses.denominators.over90_pct | Not reported in this edition | 102 |
| city.segments.houses.denominators.pending_cut_pct | Not reported in this edition | 34 |
| city.segments.houses.denominators.pending_median_cdom | Not reported in this edition | 34 |
| city.segments.houses.denominators.pending_median_cut_pct | Not reported in this edition | 19 |
| city.segments.houses.denominators.relisted_pct | Not reported in this edition | 102 |
| city.segments.houses.denominators.stale_uncut_pct | Not reported in this edition | 102 |
| city.segments.houses.dom_n | Not reported in this edition | 102 |
| city.segments.houses.fresh_held_missing_cdom_count | Not reported in this edition | 0 |
| city.segments.houses.missing_cdom_count | Not reported in this edition | 0 |
| city.segments.houses.missing_dom_count | Not reported in this edition | 0 |
| city.segments.houses.missing_price_count | Not reported in this edition | 0 |
| city.segments.houses.not_below_original_count | Not reported in this edition | 52 |
| city.segments.houses.paired_dom_cdom_n | Not reported in this edition | 102 |
| city.segments.houses.pending_cdom_n | Not reported in this edition | 34 |
| city.segments.houses.pending_cut_sample_ok | Not reported in this edition | true |
| city.segments.houses.pending_dom_n | Not reported in this edition | 34 |
| city.segments.houses.pending_missing_cdom_count | Not reported in this edition | 0 |
| city.segments.houses.pending_missing_dom_count | Not reported in this edition | 0 |
| city.segments.houses.pending_missing_price_count | Not reported in this edition | 0 |
| city.segments.houses.pending_not_below_original_count | Not reported in this edition | 15 |
| city.segments.houses.pending_raised_count | Not reported in this edition | 0 |
| city.segments.houses.pending_sample_ok | Not reported in this edition | true |
| city.segments.houses.pending_unchanged_count | Not reported in this edition | 15 |
| city.segments.houses.pending_valid_price_count | Not reported in this edition | 34 |
| city.segments.houses.unchanged_count | Not reported in this edition | 51 |
| city.segments.houses.valid_price_count | Not reported in this edition | 102 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.active | 159 | 194 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.cdom_n | Not reported in this edition | 194 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.cut_count | 75 | 96 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.cut_last30 | 23 | 33 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.cut_last30_pct | 14.5 | 17 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.cut_last7 | 1 | 6 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.cut_pct | 47.2 | 49.5 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.cut_sample_ok | Not reported in this edition | true |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.cut_small_sample | Not reported in this edition | false |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.denominators.cut_last30_pct | Not reported in this edition | 194 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.denominators.cut_pct | Not reported in this edition | 194 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.denominators.dom_bucket_pct | Not reported in this edition | 194 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.denominators.fresh_held_pct | Not reported in this edition | 194 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.denominators.median_cdom | Not reported in this edition | 194 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.denominators.median_cut_dollars | Not reported in this edition | 96 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.denominators.median_cut_pct | Not reported in this edition | 96 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.denominators.median_dom | Not reported in this edition | 194 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.denominators.over90_pct | Not reported in this edition | 194 |
Figures: county_baseline.segments.condos.denominators.pending_cut_pct through county_baseline.segments.houses.pending
| Field | Before — superseded | After — r1 |
|---|---|---|
| county_baseline.segments.condos.denominators.pending_cut_pct | Not reported in this edition | 45 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.denominators.pending_median_cdom | Not reported in this edition | 45 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.denominators.pending_median_cut_pct | Not reported in this edition | 21 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.denominators.relisted_pct | Not reported in this edition | 194 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.denominators.stale_uncut_pct | Not reported in this edition | 194 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.dom_n | Not reported in this edition | 194 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.fresh_held | 44 | 54 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.fresh_held_missing_cdom_count | Not reported in this edition | 0 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.fresh_held_pct | 27.7 | 27.8 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.median_cdom | 93 | 91 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.median_cut_dollars | 20000 | 15750 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.median_cut_pct | 8 | 6.7 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.median_dom | 88 | 85.5 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.missing_cdom_count | Not reported in this edition | 0 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.missing_dom_count | Not reported in this edition | 0 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.missing_price_count | Not reported in this edition | 0 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.not_below_original_count | Not reported in this edition | 98 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.over180 | 43 | 52 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.over90 | 83 | 98 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.over90_pct | 52.2 | 50.5 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.paired_dom_cdom_n | Not reported in this edition | 194 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.pending | 30 | 45 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.pending_cdom_n | Not reported in this edition | 45 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.pending_cut_count | 16 | 21 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.pending_cut_pct | 53.3 | 46.7 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.pending_cut_sample_ok | Not reported in this edition | true |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.pending_dom_n | Not reported in this edition | 45 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.pending_median_cdom | 81 | 75 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.pending_median_cut_pct | 9.1 | 9.3 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.pending_missing_cdom_count | Not reported in this edition | 0 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.pending_missing_dom_count | Not reported in this edition | 0 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.pending_missing_price_count | Not reported in this edition | 0 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.pending_not_below_original_count | Not reported in this edition | 24 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.pending_raised_count | Not reported in this edition | 0 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.pending_sample_ok | Not reported in this edition | true |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.pending_unchanged_count | Not reported in this edition | 24 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.pending_valid_price_count | Not reported in this edition | 45 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.raised_count | 2 | 3 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.relisted_count | 11 | 14 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.relisted_pct | 6.9 | 7.2 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.stale_uncut | 32 | 36 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.stale_uncut_pct | 20.1 | 18.6 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.unchanged_count | Not reported in this edition | 95 |
| county_baseline.segments.condos.valid_price_count | Not reported in this edition | 194 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.active | 333 | 419 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.cdom_n | Not reported in this edition | 419 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.cut_count | 160 | 204 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.cut_last30 | 74 | 95 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.cut_last30_pct | 22.2 | 22.7 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.cut_last7 | 18 | 24 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.cut_pct | 48 | 48.7 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.cut_sample_ok | Not reported in this edition | true |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.cut_small_sample | Not reported in this edition | false |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.denominators.cut_last30_pct | Not reported in this edition | 419 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.denominators.cut_pct | Not reported in this edition | 419 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.denominators.dom_bucket_pct | Not reported in this edition | 419 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.denominators.fresh_held_pct | Not reported in this edition | 419 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.denominators.median_cdom | Not reported in this edition | 419 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.denominators.median_cut_dollars | Not reported in this edition | 204 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.denominators.median_cut_pct | Not reported in this edition | 204 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.denominators.median_dom | Not reported in this edition | 419 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.denominators.over90_pct | Not reported in this edition | 419 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.denominators.pending_cut_pct | Not reported in this edition | 136 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.denominators.pending_median_cdom | Not reported in this edition | 136 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.denominators.pending_median_cut_pct | Not reported in this edition | 57 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.denominators.relisted_pct | Not reported in this edition | 419 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.denominators.stale_uncut_pct | Not reported in this edition | 419 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.dom_n | Not reported in this edition | 419 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.fresh_held | 116 | 148 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.fresh_held_missing_cdom_count | Not reported in this edition | 0 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.fresh_held_pct | 34.8 | 35.3 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.median_cut_dollars | 40000 | 45000 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.median_dom | 58 | 60 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.median_list_price | 824900 | 849990 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.missing_cdom_count | Not reported in this edition | 0 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.missing_dom_count | Not reported in this edition | 0 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.missing_price_count | Not reported in this edition | 0 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.not_below_original_count | Not reported in this edition | 215 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.over180 | 46 | 62 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.over90 | 144 | 179 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.over90_pct | 43.2 | 42.7 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.paired_dom_cdom_n | Not reported in this edition | 419 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.pending | 110 | 136 |
Figures: county_baseline.segments.houses.pending_cdom_n through tiers.houses[1].pending_cut_pct
| Field | Before — superseded | After — r1 |
|---|---|---|
| county_baseline.segments.houses.pending_cdom_n | Not reported in this edition | 136 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.pending_cut_count | 49 | 57 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.pending_cut_pct | 44.5 | 41.9 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.pending_cut_sample_ok | Not reported in this edition | true |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.pending_dom_n | Not reported in this edition | 136 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.pending_median_cdom | 41.5 | 37.5 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.pending_missing_cdom_count | Not reported in this edition | 0 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.pending_missing_dom_count | Not reported in this edition | 0 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.pending_missing_price_count | Not reported in this edition | 0 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.pending_not_below_original_count | Not reported in this edition | 79 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.pending_raised_count | Not reported in this edition | 2 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.pending_sample_ok | Not reported in this edition | true |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.pending_unchanged_count | Not reported in this edition | 77 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.pending_valid_price_count | Not reported in this edition | 136 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.relisted_count | 27 | 30 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.relisted_pct | 8.1 | 7.2 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.stale_uncut | 40 | 46 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.stale_uncut_pct | 12 | 11 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.unchanged_count | Not reported in this edition | 205 |
| county_baseline.segments.houses.valid_price_count | Not reported in this edition | 419 |
| tiers.condos[0].cities[10] | North Lauderdale | Lighthouse Point |
| tiers.condos[0].cities[11] | Lighthouse Point | Greenacres |
| tiers.condos[0].cities[12] | Greenacres | Oakland Park |
| tiers.condos[0].cities[13] | Oakland Park | Delray Beach |
| tiers.condos[0].cities[14] | Delray Beach | Pembroke Pines |
| tiers.condos[0].cities[15] | Pembroke Pines | West Palm Beach |
| tiers.condos[0].cities[16] | West Palm Beach | Not reported in this edition |
| tiers.condos[0].cities[8] | Lake Worth | Tamarac |
| tiers.condos[0].cities[9] | Tamarac | North Lauderdale |
| tiers.condos[0].cut_pct | 46.5 | 46.2 |
| tiers.condos[0].fresh_held_pct | 27.1 | 27.6 |
| tiers.condos[0].median_cdom | 101 | 100.8 |
| tiers.condos[0].median_cut_pct | 7.9 | 7.8 |
| tiers.condos[0].n_cities | 17 | 16 |
| tiers.condos[0].over90_pct | 54.7 | 54.3 |
| tiers.condos[0].pending_cut_pct | 50.8 | 49.8 |
| tiers.condos[1].over90_pct | 45.2 | 44.9 |
| tiers.condos[3].median_cdom | 108.8 | 107.5 |
| tiers.condos[3].median_cut_pct | 5.8 | 5.7 |
| tiers.condos[3].over90_pct | 57 | 56.8 |
| tiers.houses[0].cities[11] | Lake Worth Beach | Sunrise |
| tiers.houses[0].cities[12] | Sunrise | Lake Worth Beach |
| tiers.houses[1].cities[0] | Lake Worth | Royal Palm Beach |
| tiers.houses[1].cities[10] | West Palm Beach | Pembroke Pines |
| tiers.houses[1].cities[11] | Pembroke Pines | Cutler Bay |
| tiers.houses[1].cities[12] | Cutler Bay | Miramar |
| tiers.houses[1].cities[13] | Miramar | The Acreage |
| tiers.houses[1].cities[14] | The Acreage | Coral Springs |
| tiers.houses[1].cities[15] | Coral Springs | North Miami |
| tiers.houses[1].cities[16] | North Miami | Hobe Sound |
| tiers.houses[1].cities[17] | Hobe Sound | Stuart |
| tiers.houses[1].cities[18] | Stuart | Plantation |
| tiers.houses[1].cities[19] | Plantation | Westlake |
| tiers.houses[1].cities[1] | Royal Palm Beach | Homestead |
| tiers.houses[1].cities[20] | Westlake | Loxahatchee |
| tiers.houses[1].cities[21] | Loxahatchee | Miami |
| tiers.houses[1].cities[22] | Miami | Cooper City |
| tiers.houses[1].cities[23] | Cooper City | Palm City |
| tiers.houses[1].cities[24] | Palm City | Wilton Manors |
| tiers.houses[1].cities[25] | Wilton Manors | Fort Lauderdale |
| tiers.houses[1].cities[26] | Fort Lauderdale | Not reported in this edition |
| tiers.houses[1].cities[2] | Homestead | Jensen Beach |
| tiers.houses[1].cities[3] | Jensen Beach | Hallandale Beach |
| tiers.houses[1].cities[4] | Hallandale Beach | Hollywood |
| tiers.houses[1].cities[5] | Hollywood | Pompano Beach |
| tiers.houses[1].cities[6] | Pompano Beach | Dania Beach |
| tiers.houses[1].cities[7] | Dania Beach | Hialeah |
| tiers.houses[1].cities[8] | Hialeah | North Miami Beach |
| tiers.houses[1].cities[9] | North Miami Beach | West Palm Beach |
| tiers.houses[1].cut_pct | 44.9 | 44.3 |
| tiers.houses[1].fresh_held_pct | 39.3 | 39.8 |
| tiers.houses[1].median_cdom | 57.5 | 58.2 |
| tiers.houses[1].median_cut_pct | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| tiers.houses[1].n_cities | 27 | 26 |
| tiers.houses[1].pending_cut_pct | 41.1 | 41.7 |
Wording: charts[0].alt through charts[2].alt
| Field | Before — superseded | After — r1 |
|---|---|---|
| charts[0].alt | Horizontal bar chart. Palm City houses 49.0%, Martin County houses 48.0%. Condominiums: 17 for sale, too few to report. | Horizontal bar chart. Palm City houses 49%, Martin County houses 48.7%. Condominiums: 17 for sale, count only. Share of active listings asking below their original list price, September 7, 2026. |
| charts[0].caption | Share of active listings with at least one price reduction, Palm City versus Martin County, houses, September 7, 2026. Source: BeachesMLS via PBP Real Estate. | Seller Blink Rate™: share of active listings whose current asking price is below their original list price, Palm City versus Martin County, houses, September 7, 2026. Not a price history. Source: BeachesMLS via PBP Real Estate. |
| charts[0].title | Palm City houses are cutting 1.0 points more often than Martin County | Seller Blink Rate™: 49% of Palm City houses for sale are asking below their original price, in line with 48.7% across Martin County |
| charts[0].visible_labels[0] | Not reported in this edition | 48.7% |
| charts[0].visible_labels[1] | Not reported in this edition | 49% |
| charts[1].alt | Column chart of active listings by cumulative days on market. Houses: 0-30 days 33.3%, 31-60 days 17.6%, 61-90 days 8.8%, 91-180 days 30.4%, 181+ days 9.8%. | Column chart of recorded cumulative days on market. Houses: 0-30 days 33.3%, 31-60 days 17.6%, 61-90 days 8.8%, 91-180 days 30.4%, 181+ days 9.8%. |
| charts[1].caption | Active Palm City listings by cumulative days on market, houses, September 7, 2026. 40.2% of houses have passed 90 days. Source: BeachesMLS via PBP Real Estate. | Active Palm City houses by MLS-recorded CumulativeDaysOnMarket value, September 7, 2026. Shares use listings with a recorded value in that field; 40.2% of houses exceed 90 days. The field is not a reconstructed listing history. Source: BeachesMLS via PBP Real Estate. |
| charts[1].title | 40.2% of Palm City houses for sale have waited more than 90 days, counting every relisting | 40.2% of Palm City houses for sale with a recorded cumulative-days value exceed 90 days |
| charts[1].visible_labels[0] | Not reported in this edition | 33.3% |
| charts[1].visible_labels[1] | Not reported in this edition | 17.6% |
| charts[1].visible_labels[2] | Not reported in this edition | 8.8% |
| charts[1].visible_labels[3] | Not reported in this edition | 30.4% |
| charts[1].visible_labels[4] | Not reported in this edition | 9.8% |
| charts[1].visible_labels[5] | Not reported in this edition | 40.2% |
| charts[2].alt | Horizontal bar chart of price-cut share by price band, houses: Under $500K 54.5% of 11; $500K to $1M 50.0% of 62; $1M to $2M 45.8% of 24; $2M to $5M too few to read of 5; $5M and up too few to read of 0. | Horizontal bar chart of the share asking below original by current asking-price band, houses: Under $500K 54.5% (6 of 11); $500K to $1M 50% (31 of 62); $1M to $2M 45.8% (11 of 24); $2M to $5M 5 listed, count only; $5M and up 0 listed, count only. |
Wording: charts[2].caption through lede
| Field | Before — superseded | After — r1 |
|---|---|---|
| charts[2].caption | Share of active Palm City houses with a price reduction by original asking price band, September 7, 2026. Bands under 30 listings marked; under 10 not read. Source: BeachesMLS via PBP Real Estate. | Share of active Palm City houses asking below their original list price, by current asking-price band, September 7, 2026. Bands with 10 to 29 listings marked small; under 10 show a count only. Source: BeachesMLS via PBP Real Estate. |
| charts[2].title | $500K to $1M Palm City houses have cut most often: 50.0% of 62 | $500K to $1M Palm City houses show the highest share asking below original: 50% of 62 |
| charts[2].visible_labels[0] | Not reported in this edition | 0 |
| charts[2].visible_labels[10] | Not reported in this edition | 11 |
| charts[2].visible_labels[1] | Not reported in this edition | 5 |
| charts[2].visible_labels[2] | Not reported in this edition | 45.8% |
| charts[2].visible_labels[3] | Not reported in this edition | 11 |
| charts[2].visible_labels[4] | Not reported in this edition | 24 |
| charts[2].visible_labels[5] | Not reported in this edition | 50% |
| charts[2].visible_labels[6] | Not reported in this edition | 31 |
| charts[2].visible_labels[7] | Not reported in this edition | 62 |
| charts[2].visible_labels[8] | Not reported in this edition | 54.5% |
| charts[2].visible_labels[9] | Not reported in this edition | 6 |
| headlines[0] | 49.0% of Palm City houses for sale have cut their asking price | 49% of Palm City houses for sale are asking less than their original list price |
| headlines[1] | Palm City sellers blink faster than the rest of Martin County as 40.2% of houses pass 90 days on the market | Seller Blink Rate™ in Palm City: 49% of houses list below original asking, against 48.7% across Martin County |
| headlines[2] | Buying in Palm City? Half houses have already come down once, by a median $33K | Buying in Palm City? 50 of the 102 houses for sale are asking below their original price, by a median $33K |
| lede | PALM CITY, Fla., September 7, 2026 - 49.0% of the 102 single-family homes listed for sale in Palm City have reduced their asking price at least once, by a median 4.0% (about $33K), according to a daily analysis of BeachesMLS listing data by PBP Real Estate. Condominiums: 17 for sale, too few to report percentages (floor 30). | PALM CITY, Fla., September 7, 2026 - 49% of the 102 single-family homes listed for sale in Palm City (50 listings) have a current asking price below their original list price, according to PBP Real Estate's analysis of BeachesMLS listing data as of September 7, 2026. Among those 50 reduced listings, the median reduction is 4% (about $33K). Condominiums: 17 for sale, below the 30-listing floor, so no percentages are reported for them. |
Wording: method — Before — superseded, part 1 of 2
Method: counts and medians over active and under-contract residential listings in Palm City and Martin County permitted for internet display in PBP Real Estate's BeachesMLS data feed, snapshotted daily at about 5:00 AM Eastern; this kit reflects listings as of September 7, 2026. A price cut means the current asking price is below the original list price. Cumulative days on market counts every relisting; days on market as shown on portals resets on relist. Houses are single-family residences; condominiums exclude townhouses and villas; the two are never combined. Under contract includes Pending and Active Under Contract. Price bands with fewer than 30 listings are marked; fewer than 10 are not read. Sample sizes: 102 houses, 17 condominiums, 34 houses under contract. Condominiums are below the 30-listing reporting floor and appear as a count only. No estimate or model is applied; every figure is a count or a median of MLS fields. Figures refresh every morning at https://www.pbprealestate.com/price-cuts-palm-city/ . Conditions read: How the read works: each city is compared with its peer group, the South Florida cities whose median asking price
Wording: method — Before — superseded, part 2 of 2
falls in the same tier (houses and condominiums separately; the peer figure is the median of those cities). Firmer than similar-priced cities: price-cut share at least 3 points under the peer figure and at least 65% of under-contract listings (minimum 10) never cut. Cutting faster than similar-priced cities: 3 or more points over. Cutting at peer pace: in between. Where a tier has fewer than four cities the county is used instead and the label says so. Every read is relative; price cuts are under way in every one of these markets. A read of today's listings, not a forecast. Attribution: PBP Real Estate analysis of BeachesMLS listing data. This data is not verified for authenticity or accuracy and may not reflect all real estate activity in the market. Based on information (c) 2026 BeachesMLS, Inc. Equal Housing Opportunity.
Wording: method — After — r1, part 1 of 5
Method, in plain English. What we counted: active and under-contract residential listings whose MLS City field is Palm City, permitted for internet display in PBP Real Estate's BeachesMLS data feed, in one snapshot pulled 2026-09-07 12:06:07 UTC (data as of September 7, 2026). The kit reports counts, medians, shares and comparisons calculated from recorded MLS fields; it does not estimate any property's value. Asking below original: a listing's current ListPrice is lower than its OriginalListPrice in that snapshot. This is a comparison of two recorded prices at this snapshot, not a price history; listings not below original may be unchanged, raised or missing a price (51 unchanged, 1 above original, 0 without both prices among houses). The median reduction is the middle value among reduced listings only, in percent and in dollars separately; it is reported when at least 10 listings are reduced. Days on market: DaysOnMarket and CumulativeDaysOnMarket are reported as recorded in the MLS snapshot, each median over the listings with a value in that field; the over-90-day share and the distribution chart use listings with a recorded
Wording: method — After — r1, part 2 of 5
CumulativeDaysOnMarket value. These fields are not an independently reconstructed property history, do not verify whether or how often a property was relisted, and do not establish how any portal displays days on market. Price bands use the CURRENT asking price; shares within a band are percentages of that band's listings; bands with 10 to 29 listings are marked small and bands under 10 show a count only; a tie is declared at the reported precision. Segments follow the recorded tax legal description and the shared MLS classification rule: a listing whose legal description records a condominium is a condominium whatever its MLS subtype (townhouse, villa or single-family forms included); Condominium or Stock Cooperative subtypes stay in the condominium segment when the legal description is silent or records a parent parcel, including new-build units; Townhouse and Villa listings not classified as condominiums are reported in the HOA Fee Index and are outside both segments here; houses are the remaining SingleFamilyResidence listings. House and condominium statistics are never combined. These are analytical classifications of recorded fields, not a determination of any property's
Wording: method — After — r1, part 3 of 5
legal regime. Under contract means Pending or Active Under Contract; under-contract percentages need at least 30 such listings, otherwise counts only. Publication floor: 30 active listings in a segment; 30 to 39 is marked small. Condominiums are below the floor and appear as a count only. Sample sizes: 102 houses, 17 condominiums, 34 houses under contract. Geography is the MLS City field, not a municipal boundary; 13 of 158 Palm City listings carry a different county in the MLS record. County comparisons use listings whose MLS record is in Martin County. Seller Blink Rate™ is PBP Real Estate's name for the share of active listings asking below their original list price; it describes recorded asking prices, not seller intent or market health. Conditions read: How the read works: the peer baseline is the median of published city shares in the same current median-asking-price tier, houses and condominiums separately. The lower-share label requires a below-original share at least 3 points under baseline and at least 65% of under-contract listings (minimum 10) not recorded as below original. That complement may include unchanged,
Wording: method — After — r1, part 4 of 5
raised or missing-price records; it is not a history measure. The higher-share label requires 3 or more points above baseline; other results are between the rule's thresholds. With fewer than four peer cities, the county is the baseline and can include the city. Samples of 30–39 active listings require caution. Snapshot comparison only, not speed, causality or a forecast. Journalists may request the aggregate source table behind this kit (counts and medians by segment and band; no listing-level MLS records) from info@pbpre.com or 561-395-8418; nothing is gated. Edition: Data as of September 7, 2026 (BeachesMLS pull 2026-09-07T12:06:07+00:00). Corrected edition r1, issued September 8, 2026 (2026-09-08): figures recomputed from a retained later same-day BeachesMLS pull, not an exact reconstruction of the original snapshot, so they may differ from the superseded files; original edition frozen 2026-09-07T19:58:33+00:00. Cite the monthly frozen page https://www.pbprealestate.com/press/palm-city/2026-09/ (corrected edition r1). A current-data page may be available at https://www.pbprealestate.com/price-cuts-palm-city/; where published, it uses a separately dated sample and its figures may differ. Attribution: PBP Real Estate analysis of BeachesMLS listing data. This data is not verified for authenticity
Wording: method — After — r1, part 5 of 5
or accuracy and may not reflect all real estate activity in the market. Based on information (c) 2026 BeachesMLS, Inc. Equal Housing Opportunity.
Wording: quotes[0] through quotes[2]
| Field | Before — superseded | After — r1 |
|---|---|---|
| quotes[0] | "49.0 percent of single-family homes for sale in Palm City have reduced their asking price at least once, by a median $33K." | "49 percent of single-family homes for sale in Palm City have a current asking price below their original list price; among those 50 reduced listings the median reduction is $33K." |
| quotes[1] | "Counting every relisting, the median Palm City house for sale has been waiting 59 days, not the 54 the current listing shows." | "Among active Palm City houses, the median recorded CumulativeDaysOnMarket value is 59 days and the median recorded DaysOnMarket value is 54 days. These are MLS-recorded fields, not an independently reconstructed listing history." |
| quotes[2] | "Of the Palm City houses now under contract, 44.1 percent never reduced their asking price; the rest cut by a median 8.7 percent before a buyer committed. Contract prices are not known until the sales close." | "At the snapshot, 55.9 percent of the 34 Palm City houses under contract had a recorded asking price below their original list price; the median reduction among that group was 8.7 percent. The remainder were not recorded as below their original list price, which is not a price history. Agreed contract prices are not inferred from these asking prices." |
How to cite this edition
Use this dated archive URL and include the revision when citing figures or charts. Attribution:
PBP Real Estate analysis of BeachesMLS listing data, “Palm City housing data, September 2026,” listings as of September 7, 2026; reissue r1, revised 2026-09-08; retained later same-day source pull 2026-09-07T12:06:07+00:00. https://www.pbprealestate.com/press/palm-city/2026-09/
Questions about a correction or a licensed quote: Gia Freer, Broker of Record (Lic. BK689801), 561-395-8418 · info@pbpre.com.
Monthly editions and corrections: press archive. Current published city kits: press kits.
This data is not verified for authenticity or accuracy and may not reflect all real estate activity in the market. Based on information © 2026 BeachesMLS, Inc. Listings permitted for internet display. Nothing on this page is an opinion of value about any property. Equal Housing Opportunity.
All listings featuring the BMLS logo are provided by BeachesMLS, Inc. This information is not verified for authenticity or accuracy and is not guaranteed. Copyright © 2026 BeachesMLS, Inc.
IDX information is provided exclusively for consumers' personal, non-commercial use, and may not be used for any purpose other than to identify prospective properties consumers may be interested in purchasing. Data is deemed reliable but is not guaranteed accurate by the MLS. Data last updated September 7, 2026.